Don’t just report on engineering. Improve it.
Swarmia is trusted by great software organizations from startups to enterprises
What Jellyfish gets right
Jellyfish built its reputation on DevFinOps, and it earned it. Turning engineering work into investment categories, capitalization reports, and board-ready readouts is a real job, and Jellyfish does it well at large-org scale — with the portfolio and scenario planning, and the account management, that big organizations lean on.
That part isn’t in question. Jellyfish and Swarmia are Gartner Magic Quadrant Leaders — we both know how to produce a report that finance and the board will trust.
The real question is what happens after the report. A number on a slide doesn’t change anything on its own. That’s where the two platforms part ways, and it’s what the rest of this page is about.

Where Swarmia wins
Built to improve the system, not just report on it
Signals surface trends before they turn into problems. Working agreements let teams set their own targets and get a nudge in Slack or Teams the moment something slips. The people steering the org and the teams doing the work look at the same data. So a year from now, you’re not just opening a tool before board meetings. You’re opening one that helped improve the numbers you’re presenting.
Data your engineers believe and your auditors accept
Nearly all of that data updates in real time, the calculations are transparent, and there’s no hidden magic to take on faith. With Swarmia, the setup stays accurate as the org changes, rather than drifting from a configuration that was set once during onboarding.
Fits your org, not the other way around
Swarmia is opinionated by design. It works out of the box without demanding perfect Jira hygiene or a company-wide process overhaul first. Teams that work differently can still be compared side by side, without being forced into one rigid way of working.
You’re in great company
Let’s set the record straight
Isn’t Jellyfish the safer choice for a large enterprise?
Both Swarmia and Jellyfish are Gartner Magic Quadrant Leaders, and Swarmia runs capitalization and engineering intelligence for organizations well into the thousands of engineers. The difference is whether the data only reports the business of engineering or also helps improve it.
Can Swarmia handle software capitalization as rigorously as Jellyfish?
Yes. Automated FTE-based effort tracking, rule-based categorization, SOC 1 audited reports, Big Four acceptance including KPMG, and drill-down to individual commits. The FTE model has been validated at about 95 percent accuracy against traditional time tracking.
Does Swarmia give finance and the board the reporting they expect?
Yes. Investment balance, capitalization, and initiative tracking are all board-ready. The difference is that the same data also drives the working agreements and signals that move those numbers between board meetings.
Can Swarmia measure the impact of AI coding tools?
Yes. Swarmia tracks adoption, usage, and cost across AI coding tools, and connects that to engineering metrics so you can see what the investment is returning.
Is Swarmia a black box?
No. Calculations are transparent, and you can drill from any number down to the underlying work, including individual commits. Nothing you have to take on faith.
Can Swarmia roll up metrics across many teams?
Yes, from a single team to your whole organization, with the same numbers visible to leadership and the teams doing the work.



