The 3rd edition of Build is almost here — pre-order your free paperback copy →
Start free trialGet a demo
Log in

You don’t need more metrics. You need better insights.

LinearB does a stellar job in surfacing a large number of engineering metrics. Swarmia, on the other hand, gives you insights and feedback loops that help you drive the outcomes you’re after.
Get a demoStart free trial
Swarmia is trusted by great software organizations from startups to enterprises
Miro
Bolt
Honeycomb
Engine
Parloa
Matillion
Lovable
TrueLayer
Aiven
Cleo
Trustpilot
Staffbase

What LinearB gets right

LinearB built its name on delivery predictability, and it earned it. Automating the Git workflow — auto-merging, routing reviewers, enforcing pull request policy with gitStream — is a real job, and few tools do it as deeply.


That part isn’t in question. LinearB and Swarmia are both Gartner Magic Quadrant Leaders; we both know how to move work through the pipeline faster.


The real question is what happens once the pipeline is fast. The bottleneck rarely stays in Git. It moves to unclear priorities, too much context switching, a rough developer experience, and work that never maps back to business value. That’s a system problem, not a pipeline problem — and it’s what the rest of this page is about.

“We may think we’re productive and we’ve got good engineering velocity, but here’s what the data is telling us. With Swarmia, I can show the engineering org and leadership exactly where we stand.”
Santosh Poonen
Senior Director of Engineering, Matillion

Where Swarmia wins

LinearB acts on the data inside the Git workflow, and it acts well. Swarmia acts on it too — and then does three things that automating the pipeline on its own never can.

Built for the whole system,
not just the pipeline

LinearB is built to make delivery predictable: automate the path from commit to merge, route reviewers, protect ETAs. Swarmia does more than watch the pipeline — it shows you where the whole system slows down.

Once commit-to-merge is fast, the constraint moves: to unclear priorities, too much context switching, a rough developer experience, or work that doesn’t map to business value. Swarmia connects engineering metrics, AI impact, developer experience surveys, investment balance, and initiatives, so the people steering the org and the teams doing the work see the same picture end to end — not just the part of it that lives in Git.

Improvement your teams choose, not policy enforced
on them

Both platforms act on the data. The difference is who holds the pen. gitStream is policy-as-code: rules written in YAML and enforced on the pipeline. That works well for teams that want it, and lands as top-down process for teams that don’t, because rules without buy-in are the ones engineers route around.

Swarmia’s working agreements are set by the teams themselves. They choose the targets, Swarmia tracks them, and a nudge in Slack or Teams closes the loop the moment something slips. Everyone sees the same data, from individual engineers to the CTO, so there’s no secret dashboard and no information gap.

Direction for leadership,
not just more metrics

LinearB gives leaders plenty to look at: dashboards, forecasts, and metrics across every team. But more metrics isn’t the same as more clarity. When every team can configure its own view, leadership ends up with a pile of charts and no shared read on what actually matters, and turning that into a decision falls to whoever has the time and the expertise to do it.

Swarmia is opinionated on purpose. It comes with a research- and experience-backed view of what good engineering looks like, surfaces the biggest risks and opportunities as signals, and sends leadership a regular report on what changed and why. Leaders get a prioritized read on where to look next, not a pile of charts to interpret on their own.
Ready to see the difference for yourself?
Get a demo

You’re in great company

“Swarmia offers visibility to different metrics for people in different roles. For individual contributors you get insights about your code, for teams you get information about how you are performing and how you are living according to your team agreements, and for management overall insights about how the whole development organization is doing.”

Verified User

IT Services
“Swarmia offers easy and flexible onboarding. The same flexibility is used across the whole software.”

Verified User

Media
“Swarmia has been an absolute game-changer for me and my team on collaboration and code management. It has provided us with the much-needed clarity and insights into our work, helping us identify areas that require attention.”

Verified User

Software
“We've been really happy with Swarmia. It gives the much needed visibility for developers to see their own development metrics.”

Verified User

Travel & Hospitality
“I am exceptionally happy with the decision to bring in the use of Swarmia as part of the product team’s development tools. Swarmia has enabled the team to make appropriate changes to increase development speed, based on the data of our earlier performance.”

Verified User

Software
“I can highly recommend Swarmia. The tool was really easy to deploy, and it provides a lot of good insights. Also, our developers love the Slack integration.”

Verified User

Software
Let’s set the record straight
Isn’t LinearB the better choice if we mostly need pull request automation?

If your main goal is automating the Git workflow, LinearB’s gitStream is strong, and it may be the right fit. Most teams find the bottleneck doesn’t stay in the pipeline, though. Once commit-to-merge is fast, the constraint moves to priorities, focus, developer experience, and whether effort maps to business value. That’s what Swarmia is built to improve.

Can Swarmia automate our pull request workflow the way gitStream does?

Swarmia focuses on team-owned improvement rather than pipeline enforcement. Instead of YAML rules applied to every PR, teams set their own working agreements, and Swarmia tracks them and nudges in Slack or Teams when something slips.

Is Swarmia’s pricing predictable as we scale?

Yes. Pricing is published and charged per engineer, so what you pay tracks headcount and stays straightforward to forecast as your headcount grows.

Can Swarmia measure the impact of AI coding tools?

Yes. Beyond who has which license, Swarmia connects AI usage and cost to delivery, so you can see whether the tools are changing how work actually flows across the org.

Is Swarmia a black box?

No. The calculations are transparent, nearly all of the data updates in real time, and you can drill from a top-level number down to individual commits. There’s no hidden model to take on faith.

Can Swarmia roll up metrics across many teams?

Yes. Teams that work differently can still be compared side by side, without being forced into one rigid process, and metrics roll up cleanly from a single team to the whole organization.

See how Swarmia compares to LinearB for yourself

Get a personalized walkthrough and find out what Swarmia can do for your engineering organization.
How many engineers work in your company?
What is your primary source code hosting platform?
What is your primary issue tracking software?